/dídac_mdef_website

contact.me

/weekEight.community_engagement

(28_november_2021)

This week, Mercè and Markel from HOLON conducted the sessions related to community engagement. In these classes, the members of HOLON made us think about our way of designing and creating, where often our vision is not always open and all the effort is focused on developing the project individually.

This way of working that we follow is so integrated that it doesn't allow you to contribute to a common objective, which is why Markel and Mercè suggested that we act differently: before establishing a specific project idea, observe and try to investigate what projects there are around your idea, what communities exist and what tasks are being done, how the topic you want to work on is approached from other perspectives. Taking all these factors into account, you may be able to contribute much more to your target, and you may also be able to participate in a network of projects focused on the same topic.


4D

4D

.community_activities

During the four days of this course, we worked on our collaborative design intervention and focused the exercises proposed to us on the theme that each group had chosen.

The first exercise proposed to us to create a stronger basis for our interventions was to create a mapping of the projects in Barcelona and its surroundings related to our theme. In our case, the group formed by Chris, Juaco and myself, our main topics are technology, music and nature. From there, we started to look for communities and projects around these subjects, separately and also combining them (nature-technology, music-technology, nature-music). This was the result of our mapping:

After this, we had to analyse in a more precise way the role of the actors involved in our map. The aim of this second exercise was to get to know in more depth what tasks the other communities and individuals are carrying out in order to define more clearly what the direction of collaboration and contribution in the field could be. Therefore, we chose the agent that we thought could be most relevant and defined the following topics: context, current situation, engagement & limits, theory of change and design opportunities.

Finally, starting from a multiscalar diagram, we had to situate the agents of our map according to four different levels of impact on the matter in question: parameters, feedback, design and intervention. This allowed us to see how the agents involved to our topic are related to the global scene and the role of each of the parts.